2/03/2019

Ways To Defend Yourself Against Possession Of CDS NJ Convictions

By Janet Thompson


If you are summoned of possessing controlled dangerous substances in your vehicle, you can be sure of facing stern charges. Also, the fines may extend to $50.00, and the law states a mandatory two-year forfeiture of your driving license. Remember, charges of possession of CDS NJ are in most cases associated with the impeachment of illegal substances such as drug paraphrenia or marijuana.

However, for the alleged to be convicted for having committed the crime, various elements ought to be obtained. These may include ascertaining that the driver was operating the vehicle. Besides, the operation following the allegation must have taken place in the main roadway exposed to the public. The evidence must be presented and proven the driver was indeed aware of the existence of the drugs in their automobile.

If there is a bone of contention regarding the evidence provided by the law enforcement, then the case will be discharged. Following a statement in one of the supreme courts, the word possession is equivocal, which makes cases of this nature challenging to handle. Possessing illegal drugs crimes falls under three types. We have joint, constructive and actual holding crimes.

Actual custody is considered by many as physically possessing an object. Thus, it becomes a challenge to for your case to be dismissed if accused of this offense. However, constructive custody crimes are complicated when it comes to providing substantial proof. Thus, easily discharged entirely.The law will consider individual guilt of constructive related crimes if they are aware of the object. Also, if they can enforce control of the item irrespective of the distance they are from the object, they can be considered guilty. Therefore, for can be charged against constructive custody or control of the particular substance.

However, there are various instances where cases can be dismissed following constructive holding charges. If the driver played no role in purchasing the item or and are clueless of the object, then no grounds for accusing them. Or if the drive is unknowingly carrying a passenger who possesses an illegal substance, they are not eligible for impeachment.

Situations where the physical setting of the illegal object is miles away from the driver, the law cannot be taken against them. For instance, if a legal officer discovered the substances in the cars backseat, which is not within proximity of the drive. These cases are not liable for the driver to be charged.

In a scenario where the person driving the car is not the actual owner, this can affect the ruling of the case. For instance, the particular individual may have gotten the vehicle from their friend, and during a road search, a law reinforcement officer finds some marijuana in the auto. Such circumstances will make it difficult to know who to hold responsible.

You can fight the charges against this kind of allegation by challenging the processes by which the proof was obtained. You can question the basis you being stopped by the officer. Also, you can dispute the confiscation of the substances discovered in the vehicle. That calls for scrutiny of the search that was done by the law enforcement. The biggest obstacle will be to prevent the compulsory loss of your license for two years if confirmed guilty.




About the Author:



No comments:

Post a Comment