I'm writing this article because of a debate that just recently happened in a piano forum I take part in. The argument was on the appropriate use of the words when explaining reading music, particularly the term "sight reading".
If you are sight checking out a piece of songs, is it the first time you are playing it or have you played it previously, and therefore are only reading music and no longer sight reviewing it? Some in the forum felt that using the term "sight reading" didn't efficiently explain the procedure I was talking about at the time.
I had not understood there were such sturdy thoughts around the method we describe playing sheet songs, however I learned rapidly that there are even more than a couple of people with varying opinions on the use of words. I'll share both sides of the argument and provide my very own thoughts on the subject.
Lots of in the music neighborhood view the term "sight reading" to indicate "checking out music on first sight". This might be your definition too, and is often the end goal for anybody trying to check out songs.
Many websites and forums are committed to the capability to play music at first sight, a skill that is really tough to master, and can be irritating, specifically for the newbie piano student. A lot of piano players should play through a piece of music numerous times prior to having the ability to play it right with.
So this definition would lead lots of to think that sight reading is an impossible activity for the novice. I personally do not like this minimal view and therefore I often agree with the more general meaning.
The opposite of the argument is more where I stand. The term "sight reading" to me simply suggests "playing music by what you see" instead of playing by ear or by rote (mimicking another user, like on YouTube).
I don't make a determination as to whether it is the first reading or the hundredth. In reality, I would define one's sight reading ability not only by the trouble of the pieces they can play, however additionally by how many times it takes them to play it prior to the blunders are minimal.
Even for an experienced pro, every extra time reviewing a piece of songs usually leads to even more precision. If you could be able to play a piece of songs by spending 5-10 mins with it, playing it with a few times and then able to play it beautifully, wouldn't that be an achievement of your ability to check out songs by sight?
If you are sight checking out a piece of songs, is it the first time you are playing it or have you played it previously, and therefore are only reading music and no longer sight reviewing it? Some in the forum felt that using the term "sight reading" didn't efficiently explain the procedure I was talking about at the time.
I had not understood there were such sturdy thoughts around the method we describe playing sheet songs, however I learned rapidly that there are even more than a couple of people with varying opinions on the use of words. I'll share both sides of the argument and provide my very own thoughts on the subject.
Lots of in the music neighborhood view the term "sight reading" to indicate "checking out music on first sight". This might be your definition too, and is often the end goal for anybody trying to check out songs.
Many websites and forums are committed to the capability to play music at first sight, a skill that is really tough to master, and can be irritating, specifically for the newbie piano student. A lot of piano players should play through a piece of music numerous times prior to having the ability to play it right with.
So this definition would lead lots of to think that sight reading is an impossible activity for the novice. I personally do not like this minimal view and therefore I often agree with the more general meaning.
The opposite of the argument is more where I stand. The term "sight reading" to me simply suggests "playing music by what you see" instead of playing by ear or by rote (mimicking another user, like on YouTube).
I don't make a determination as to whether it is the first reading or the hundredth. In reality, I would define one's sight reading ability not only by the trouble of the pieces they can play, however additionally by how many times it takes them to play it prior to the blunders are minimal.
Even for an experienced pro, every extra time reviewing a piece of songs usually leads to even more precision. If you could be able to play a piece of songs by spending 5-10 mins with it, playing it with a few times and then able to play it beautifully, wouldn't that be an achievement of your ability to check out songs by sight?
About the Author:
There are innovative strategies to enhance the skills to decrease blunders and you could review more on this at my blog: http://gibson-acoustic-guitar.com/.
No comments:
Post a Comment